Doktorsitesi.com

WAS THE FATHER OF PSYCHOANALYSIS A GOOD FATHER?

Psk. Dan. Gözde Nur Uysal
Psk. Dan. Gözde Nur Uysal
11 Kasım 202510 görüntülenme
Randevu Al
With the popularization of psychology in recent years, most of us have at least heard the name of one of the greatest figures in the history of the field: Sigmund Freud. But today, we’re going to look not at Freud the psychoanalyst, but Freud the father. The founder of psychoanalysis, whose name is still discussed even a century later—was he also a good parent?
WAS THE FATHER OF PSYCHOANALYSIS A GOOD FATHER?

With the popularization of psychology in recent years, most of us have at least heard the name of one of the greatest figures in the history of the field: Sigmund Freud. But today, we’re going to look not at Freud the psychoanalyst, but Freud the father. The founder of psychoanalysis, whose name is still discussed even a century later—was he also a good parent?

Let’s start by briefly getting to know Freud.
He was an Austrian neurologist who challenged the medical understanding of his time by advocating the so-called “talking cure.”
He founded psychoanalysis and introduced concepts such as the unconscious, dream interpretation, repressed drives, and the Oedipus complex.
Even today, he remains one of the most controversial figures in the history of psychology—both for his use of cocaine, his theories centered on sexual drives, and his sexist views toward women.

Freud had six children, but here we’ll focus on his relationship with Anna Freud.
Anna was Freud’s favorite child—his closest companion. While her siblings married and started their own families, Anna devoted nearly her entire life to her father and to expanding his theories.
Sources tell us that Freud affectionately called her “my little general.” He would often take her on long walks, discuss books with her, read notes aloud, and treat her almost like a professional advisor. Naturally, this “special” bond caused some tension within the family, as Anna’s siblings were said to resent her privileged position.

Up to this point, one might think Freud was at least a good father to Anna—but the truth is not so simple.
Freud’s relationship with his daughter was one where boundaries blurred, emotions were repressed, and ethical questions arose.
He was not only the founder of psychoanalysis but also a domineering paternal figure.
Their relationship was both complex and, at times, disturbingly close.

Questions about Anna’s sexual identity were frequently raised. Some sources go further, suggesting she was indeed homosexual.

In 1918, when Anna was 23 years old, Freud decided to personally analyze her—officially to treat insomnia, anxiety, and repressed impulses.
But many believe the real reason was Freud’s concern about her attraction to women.
Her emotionally intense friendships with female companions disturbed him, and through analysis, Freud hoped to “normalize” her.

These analytic sessions continued for years. Anna herself defended the process for the rest of her life—but many later psychoanalysts described it as emotional manipulation, even a form of coercion that changed the course of her life.
Anna Freud possessed great intelligence and creativity, but her personal life remained blurred by her father’s dominance and control.

Her closest lifelong relationship was with the educator Dorothy Burlingham. They lived and worked together, but the nature of their relationship was never openly discussed.
Letters, notes, and testimonies from people close to Anna suggest that she suppressed her sexual orientation—perhaps as a sacrifice to her father’s ideals.

Some psychoanalysts argue that Anna gave up her individuality for her father’s legacy.
Did Freud love his daughter? Yes.
But he also shaped her destiny.
He interfered with her personal desires, her relationships, and even her career choices.
To Freud, Anna was not only a daughter but also the heir to his intellectual empire.

That’s why some historians describe his fatherhood as a form of “hidden narcissistic investment.”
After Freud’s death, Anna devoted herself to preserving his theories while also developing her own—especially in child psychoanalysis and defense mechanisms.
Yet she was always remembered as “Freud’s daughter.”
Her personal achievements and private life remained largely in the shadows.

Though she had close relationships with women, she never lived openly as herself.
Many scholars interpret Anna’s lifelong existence in her father’s shadow as a form of emotional control.
Some argue she was never truly allowed to become an individual.

Freud may well have been the father of psychoanalysis,
but was he truly a good father?
Could the same love that drove him also have suppressed, directed, and shaped his daughter’s life?

I leave those questions to you.
With love. ❤️

Yazar Hakkında

Psk. Dan. Gözde Nur Uysal

Psk. Dan. Gözde Nur Uysal

Gözde Nur Uysal lisans eğitimini Sırbistan Belgrad Novi Pazar Üniversitesi Psikoloji Bölümü'nde tamamlamıştır. Lisans eğitiminin ardından çeşitli psikoterapi ekollerinde eğitimler alarak mesleki bilgi birikimini derinleştirmiştir.

Kısa Süreli Çözüm Odaklı Terapi, Bilişsel Davranışçı Terapi (BDT), Cinsel Terapi, Aile ve Çift Terapisi, Duygu Odaklı Terapi, Bağlanma Odaklı Terapi ve Travma Odaklı Terapi gibi farklı alanlarda kapsamlı eğitimler almış; süpervizyon ve vaka analizleriyle bu alanlarda aktif olarak çalışmaktadır.

Mesleki gelişimine önem veren Gözde Nur Uysal, Fransız Lape Hastanesi’nde bağımlılık psikolojisi üzerine yürütülen özel bir staj programına kabul edilmiştir. Kariyerine Reaksiyon Psikoloji Merkezi'nde devam eden Gözde Nur Uysal, burada ağırlıklı olarak cinsel terapi, aile ve çift ilişkileri, bağımlılık, anksiyete bozuklukları, ilişki çatışmaları, kendilik algısı ve duygusal düzenleme sorunları alanlarında danışanlarla çalışmaktadır.

Danışanlarının içsel dünyasını derinlemesine anlamaya, yaşadıkları zorlukların altında yatan duygusal ve bilişsel örüntüleri fark etmelerine rehberlik etmeye önem verir. Terapi sürecinde bireyin kendi yaşam öyküsünü keşfetmesini, ilişkisel farkındalık geliştirmesini ve içsel dengesini yeniden kurmasını hedefler.

Gözde Nur Uysal, seanslarını hem Türkçe hem de İngilizce olarak yürütmektedir. Yurt dışında yaşayan veya İngilizce terapi tercih eden danışanlar için online psikoterapi hizmeti sunmaktadır.
Sevgiler.

--------------------------------------------

Gözde Nur Uysal completed her undergraduate studies in the Department of Psychology at the University of Novi Pazar in Belgrade, Serbia. Following her graduation, she enhanced her professional knowledge by receiving training in various psychotherapy approaches.

She has completed comprehensive training programs in Solution-Focused Brief Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Sex Therapy, Family and Couple Therapy, Emotion-Focused Therapy, Attachment-Based Therapy, and Trauma-Focused Therapy. She continues to apply these approaches in her practice through supervision and case analyses.

Committed to ongoing professional development, Gözde Nur Uysal was accepted into a specialized internship program at French Lape Hospital, where she gained clinical experience in the field of addiction psychology.

She currently continues her career at Reaksiyon Psychology Center, where she primarily works with clients on sexual therapy, family and couple relationships, addiction, anxiety disorders, relationship conflicts, self-perception, and emotional regulation difficulties.

In her therapeutic approach, she aims to help clients gain deeper awareness of their inner world and guide them in recognizing the emotional and cognitive patterns underlying their difficulties. Throughout the therapeutic process, she encourages individuals to explore their personal narratives, develop relational awareness, and restore emotional balance.

Gözde Nur Uysal conducts therapy sessions in both Turkish and English. She also provides online psychotherapy for clients living abroad or those who prefer to have therapy sessions in English.

Warm regards,
Gözde Nur Uysal

Önemli Bilgilendirme

Site içerisinde bulunan bilgiler bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. Bu bilgilendirme kesinlikle hekimin hastasını tıbbi amaçla muayene etmesi veya tanı koyması yerine geçmez.