Is enoxaparin necessary to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism positive recurrent pregnancy loss cases?

The association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism and recurrent pregnancy loss is still under debate. Moreover, the use of enoxaparin to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes is controversial in these patients. We aimed to analyse the effect of enoxaparin on pregnancy outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss with only methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism. A total of 339 pregnant women with recurrent pregnancy loss and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism between June 2017 and March 2019 were included. Patients were divided into two groups: enoxaparin plus folic acid (n=165) and folic acid group (n=174). Then, these groups were divided into subgroups: MTHFR A1298C homozygous (n=52), MTHFR A1298C heterozygous (n=141), MTHFR C677T homozygous (n=56) and MTHFR C677T heterozygous (n=90). Pregnancy outcomes were recorded and compared between two main group, and also between subgroups. There was no significant difference between enoxaparin plus folic acid group and only folic acid group according to delivery week (p=0.287), birthweight (p=0.677), miscarriage (p=0.372), stillbirth (p=0.585), live birth (p=0.246), preterm birth (p=0.700), anomaly (p=0.883), preeclampsia (p=0.656), intrauterine growth restriction (p=0.764), neonatal intensive care unit admission (p=0.820), APGAR 1st minutes<7 (p=0.729), APGAR 5th minutes<7 (p=1.000) and cesarean delivery (p=0.540). Furthermore there was no statistically significant difference with regard to delivery week, birthweight, miscarriage, stillbirth, live birth, preterm birth, anomaly, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, neonatal intensive care unit admission, APGAR 1st minute <7, APGAR 5th minute <7 and cesarean delivery between each subgroups. Contrary to the increasing trend of using empirical therapy with low molecular weight heparin in Turkey, we firstly demonstrated that there is no necessity to use enoxaparin to improve pregnancy outcomes both in homozygous and heterozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism related pregnancy loss cases. We suggest that only folic acid is enough for these cases.

Is enoxaparin necessary to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism positive recurrent pregnancy loss cases?

PP

Bu makale 13 Ağustos 2024 tarihinde güncellendi. 0 kez okundu.

Yazar
Op. Dr. Hakan Sağer

Sertifikalar ve Kurslar  Fonksiyonel Kozmetik Jinekoloji Cerrahi ve Cerrahi Dışı Uygulamalar Kursu - 2023 Uluslararası Entegratif Kognitif Psikoterapi Enstitüsü(IICPI) Cinsellik,Cinsel Terapi ve Cinsel Tedaviler Eğitimi - 2021 T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Mezoterapi Sertifikalı Eğitim Programı - 2021 İntegratif Tıp Derneği İp Askı Uygulamaları Eğitim Kursu - 2022 Medical Academy Center Botulinum Toxin and Dermal Filler Training Program - 2022 Acıbadem Üniversitesi Deney Hayvanları Kullanım Sertifikası - 2018 T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Neonatal Resüsitasyon Programı Uygulayıcı Sertifikası - 2021 Ege Perinatoloji Derneği İleri Biyoistatistik Kursu - 2021 Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetri Derneği 14. TJOD Asistan Okulu - 2019 Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Bursa Yüksek İhtisas E.A. Hastanesi ''Temel Fetal Ultrasonografi Kursu'' - 2022 İnternational ...

Yazarı sosyal medya'da takip edin
Etiketler
Enoxaparin, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, recurrent pregnancy loss, thrombophilia, habitual abortion
Op. Dr. Hakan Sağer
Op. Dr. Hakan Sağer
Bursa - Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube